European standards

Burgers may still be vegan, but steaks are made of meat only: the EU’s half-hearted decision on ‘meat sounding’

Terms most closely associated with meat may not be used for plant-based products, but exceptions are provided for, such as for sausages, nuggets or meatballs

by Emiliano Sgambato

Aggiornato il 16 giugno 2026 alle 19.15

I prodotti Plant based conquistano gli italiani

6' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

6' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

In the end, a compromise – a ‘Solomonic’ one, so to speak – was reached, which may well end up causing even more confusion and leaving just about everyone dissatisfied. The final go-ahead came on 16 June with the approval – 560 votes in favour, 75 against and 25 abstentions – by MEPs of the regulation amending the EU rules on the common organisation of agricultural markets. Alongside measures aimed at protecting prices through collective bargaining, there has also been a ban on the use of the term ‘meat’ on vegan or synthetic products.

We are talking about what is known as “meat sounding”, that is, the possibility of using names associated with the animal world for products made from plant-based ingredients. The so-called “EU Trilogue” (a body liaising between the Commission, the Council and the Parliament, ed.) had already agreed in March on a list of 31 terms that may no longer be used for

These include terms associated with animals, such as ‘chicken’, ‘beef’ or ‘pork’, as well as names of specific cuts of meat such as ‘breast’ and ‘bacon’; the terms “steak” and “liver” were also included in the list of restrictions during the negotiations. So what does the compromise entail? It means that commonly used terms such as “burger”, “sausage” and “nuggets” will remain permitted even for plant-based products.

Products of this kind, with names such as “soya burgers”, have in fact been on the market for years, but in the wake of the alarm caused by the possible (and, at least for now, still hypothetical) arrival of artificial meat (or ‘synthetic’, if you prefer) in our supermarkets, a debate has opened up (primarily a legislative one, to be honest, given that consumers seem to are well aware of how to distinguish beef or pork from soya and peas, regardless of what is written on the packaging... and, after all, you can’t label soya burgers as beef burgers, and vice versa).

What do the new rules entail

The fact is that, in order to establish that hamburgers can only be called such if they result from the slaughter of an animal, several countries – and subsequently the European Union – have attempted to introduce legislation, though there have been a number of changes of direction in the complex process of European governance (which, incidentally, has not yet reached its conclusion). In the autumn of last year, the approach seemed ‘prohibitionist’: no more ‘fake’ nuggets and sausages stuffed with pulses. Instead, after just a few months, here is the compromise: ‘meat-sounding’ terms will indeed be banned, but not for all terms, only those most closely associated with meat, such as ‘fillet’ or ‘liver’. So, vegan burgers and nuggets are fine, but not ‘bamboo-seed-crusted thigh’ or tofu ‘steak’ or ‘ribs’.

This is the result of the agreement between the Council, the Commission and the European Parliament as part of the wider reform of the regulation on the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets (COM) proposed ‘to strengthen farmers’ bargaining position in the supply chain’.

The agreement ‘protects’ the terms beef, veal, pork, poultry, chicken, turkey, duck, goose, lamb, mutton, sheep, goat, leg, fillet, sirloin, flank, loin, steak, ribs, shoulder, shank, chop, wing, breast, liver, thigh, breast, rib steak, T-bone, rump and pancetta. ‘These terms are reserved exclusively for meat products and may therefore not be used for products that do not contain meat, such as those derived from cell cultures,’ states a note from the Council.
Here is the list of prohibited names in English: Beef; Veal; Pork; Poultry; Chicken; Turkey; Duck; Goose; Lamb; Mutton; Ovine; Goat; Drumstick; Tenderloin; Sirloin; Flank; Loin; Ribs; Shoulder; Shank; Chop; Wing; Breast; Thigh; Brisket; Ribeye; T-bone; Rump; Bacon; Steak; Liver.

The co-legislators have agreed to grant producers three years to sell off their existing stocks and comply with the new rules once they come into force. However, the technical details of the text still need to be finalised, after which the text will be put to a vote in the Agriculture and Fisheries Council, comprising ministers from the Member States, and then to a final vote in Parliament’s plenary session.

Mixed reactions

This is a success for Italia, whose agri-food model has been recognised at European level. Furthermore, the EU has decided to adopt a rule that is already in force in Italia to give our farmers greater bargaining power. One key provision is the inclusion of a review clause for contracts exceeding six months for the supply of raw materials: our farmers will be able to request, in all EU Member States, the inclusion of a renegotiation clause to adjust the selling price of their products in line with market trends. ‘This is a decisive step towards ensuring that our farmers are recognised for their true value and receive a fair income,’ stated the Minister for Agriculture, Food Sovereignty and Forestry, Francesco Lollobrigida, in a press release.

The Plant-Based Products Group of Unione Italiana Food, a trade association affiliated with Confindustria, also expressed its satisfaction with the decision: ‘This decision is a common-sense outcome that rewards the transparency of plant-based products, starting with their current names and labelling. The approved version of the law, whilst restricting the use of certain terms, does not exclude names such as ‘burger’, ‘sausage’ or ‘meatballs’ for plant-based products, thus avoiding both penalising those who have been choosing these products for years and creating confusion amongst attentive and informed consumers. It has been clearly understood that these names refer to the product’s shape and how it is processed, not to its contents, and this is certainly a positive development. The plant-based product brands affiliated with Unione Italiana Food market their products using clear, self-explanatory methods and names, in full compliance with the regulations, with labels that allow consumers to easily find and choose the products they wish to serve at home from the shelves, without any risk of confusion. We will continue to work towards innovative, sustainable and tasty food.”

Coldiretti is also satisfied , claiming to have fought a battle “for public health and for clarity on what ends up on people’s tables”. According to the association, the agreement aims to avoid ‘creating confusion amongst consumers’. Coldiretti believes that the list of names that may not be used ‘should be further expanded to strengthen the protection of produce and ensure accurate information’.

“This is an important step towards greater clarity for consumers and the protection of the livestock sector,” comments Serafino Cremonini, president of Assocarni. “We have long been calling for terms such as ‘meat’, ‘steak’ or ‘fillet’ to be used exclusively for products of animal origin. “The work carried out by the Minister for Agriculture, Francesco Lollobrigida, is aimed at enhancing the transparency of product names and promoting products of animal origin.”

By contrast, organisations that view limiting meat consumption as a necessary step towards environmental sustainability have voiced criticism. The No Confusion coalition – led by the European Vegetarian Union (EVU) and WePlanet, and bringing together over 600 organisations, NGOs and food companies across Europe – has expressed concern over what it describes as a “pointless ban” and is calling for a thorough impact assessment of the legislation’s legal and market implications.

At the same time, the group welcomes the fact that the descriptive terms most commonly used and familiar to consumers have been retained. “In the current political and social climate, it is incomprehensible that our elected representatives continue to devote time and resources to a problem that simply does not exist. This decision runs counter to several EU priorities, including competitiveness, innovation, food safety, affordability and farmers’ incomes. We are pleased that, to some extent, common sense has prevailed, but the point is that there was no problem to solve in the first place,” said Rafael Pinto, senior policy manager at the European Vegetarian Union.

‘The ban helps no one: neither farmers, nor consumers, nor the businesses that have invested in innovation. For us in the sector, this has never been merely a matter of labelling but a question of competitiveness and the future. Introducing new bureaucratic barriers at a time when the EU should be strengthening its industrial capacity is a choice we cannot afford to make. Italia has the expertise and tradition to become a key player in the protein transition: it is a real shame to squander this opportunity with regulations that look to the past rather than the future,” says Massimo Santinelli, CEO of Biolab.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...